Dental Implants vs Mini Dental Implants

In this video, Dr. Rose Magno compares conventional and mini implants, highlighting the benefits of mini implants for faster healing and suitability for patients with bone loss. Schedule a consultation at our Emeryville office, serving San Francisco, East Bay, and Oakland.

The difference between conventional dental implants and mini implants lies in their size, placement technique, and suitability for various conditions.

Mini Dental Implants offer several advantages:

1. Minimally Invasive: Unlike conventional implants, mini implants typically do not require surgical procedures that involve opening the gums. This makes them less invasive and significantly reduces recovery time.

2. Faster Healing: Due to their smaller diameter and less invasive placement, mini implants result in shorter healing times compared to conventional implants.

3. Bone Requirements: Mini implants are ideal for patients who have experienced bone loss. Traditional implants require a certain thickness of bone to provide stability, which may not be present if the tooth has been missing for a long time. Mini implants can be placed in narrower or more resorbed bone, eliminating the need for bone grafting in many cases.

Conventional Implants, sometimes referred to as regular or traditional implants, are larger and require more bone for placement. They often involve more complex surgical procedures and longer healing periods, making them less suitable for patients with significant bone loss.

For individuals with limited bone density or those seeking a less invasive option, mini implants—also known as narrow or small-diameter implants—are often the best alternative. They provide a secure and effective solution for restoring functionality and aesthetics while minimizing discomfort and recovery time.